Recent Posts
Брояч от 3.2006г.
7376943
Users Today : 1857
This Month : 99717
This Year : 514662
Views Today : 8542
Who's Online : 84

Jehovah: The Architecture of Religion

Jehovah: The Architecture of Religion

Contact: architect

Ch.: Please identify yourself.
Power: Jehovah, the eleventh level of free worlds.
Ch.: I thought for a long time: if God the Son of Christianity is the specific oversoul Christ, who then is God the Father in this vertical? Are you God the Father of Christianity?
I.: Let’s agree on the option that I am the architect of the Christian religion. And the flows of her energy exchange really close on me. As you can see, the soul can climb high in development through Christianity. After all, the level of the architect of a religion also sets the range of levels to which its adherent can ascend if he shows consistency and devotion to his chosen teaching.
Ch.: Do I understand correctly that in the Trinity, the Holy Spirit refers to that substance that my previous interlocutors called the resource of life?
I.: You understand correctly. No creator is capable of creating worlds without Divine substance. Only she is capable of breathing life into creatures. Only with her does creation become divine. That’s why I shied away from the status of God the Father that you voiced.
On the one hand, levels from seventh and above are the levels of gods. One might say that their “institutes” are located there, where the gods are already mastering the tools of creation as adults. A person is still learning to be the creator of his own life. But at the levels of gods, powerful minds are already capable of creating their own peoples, civilizations, worlds, star systems, galaxies, etc. On the other hand, the sacred meaning of the Trinity is such that without the Holy Spirit the Creator becomes very limited in his creation. And this inextricable connection, this strict conditionality must be understood.
We all – you and I – submit to a higher will. And we must humbly accept the fact that we are all parts of something greater: majestic, omnipresent, truly eternal.
I, the architect of the Christian religion, Jehovah, leave the status of almighty God the Father to the one who is above me, who rules even over the most powerful, who manifests such a powerful original will that no other will in this world can resist it.
CH: And who is this, from your point of view?
I.: If creators create worlds by pouring Divine substance into them, but are not able to fully control their creation, it is most natural to assume that the creator is not the only source of will. That there is something more influencing the systems he creates. I call this the original will. But who exactly does it belong to? Or is it simply a cumulative manifestation of the will of the souls participating in the systems created by the creator? Perhaps someday we will know the answer to this question. In the meantime, this remains a question for philosophical reflection at leisure (Smiles).
What is democracy?
C.: This is when decisions are made collectively, and each participant has an equal right to vote.
I.: Now add here the concept of the will of souls. There are souls with low will, and souls with high will. This will naturally sets a kind of correction coefficient for each participant in our conditional voting. It doesn’t work out like that in life: 1 community member = 1 vote. More often it happens that one soul’s voice actually weighs 0.01 – because the will in it barely glimmers. And another soul may have the weight of 10 votes at once, because its natural will is powerfully manifested.
C: Do you mean the will that is naturally inherent in the soul? Or will, as permission from higher Forces to influence certain worlds?
I.: I’m talking about the natural will of the soul. Because the permissions issued by higher development participants to lower level participants are actually secondary. First, the soul itself exhibits high natural will, and then higher structures take a closer look at it and give it some statuses. Will is not made by hands, will is not regalia.
Will is a highly mysterious bird. Which of us she will pamper with her presence, which one she will sit on next moment on the shoulder, and which one she will leave – this is not up to us to decide. We can only serve evolution faithfully in the hope that the will will continue to sit comfortably on our shoulder (Smiles).
I voiced to you the most famous theory of the emergence of will as a powerful driver of change: the will of God is the totality of the will of all souls participating in the community and its superior patrons. Wherever the global aggregate flows of will in a given world rush, the world itself will go there.
There are other theories for big fans of mysteries and mysticism. But this is not a matter of primary importance. The most important question for humanity now is different: why do higher beings honor the higher will and treat it with sacred trepidation, but an earthling does not honor anyone but his own, and treats only his own desires with sacred trepidation? Why is there so little God left in the hearts of people? And what do they expect, having plunged into this darkness of the soul?
Having abandoned faith in God, people have lost such an essential quality for spiritual development as fear of God. And without it, it is unlikely that such a destructive world will be able to find its way to a better future. In any case, faith in God on Earth must be restored.
CH: On WikiPedia writes that “fear of God is the fear of offending God by violating His will, which develops special vigilance, humility and prayer.” How do you understand this quality?
I.: You see, as long as there is God in the heart of a believer, strictly watching over his thoughts and behavior, a person strives to restrain himself from causing harm to others. That is, the fear of the Lord is a self-prohibition that blocks the manifestation of a person’s destructive properties in the outside world.
I don’t expect blind faith from you because I understand that you are smart and need rational explanations. I’m giving them to you. Realize the harmony of this deep mechanism of influence of the Christian religion on a person through fear of God.
Fear of God is the most basic block against causing harm around oneself, and even a simple illiterate person can master this idea. That is, this idea is universal and accessible to a person at any level of his development. After all, the Christian religion was created with the expectation of wide coverage and different intellectual abilities of believers.
What happens when there is no God in a person’s heart? There is no fear of him either. Already at this stage, a significant imbalance immediately arises. Nothing serious seems to have happened yet. Man has not yet done anything wrong, he has simply abandoned the idea of God. But the flywheel of chaos has already begun to spin slowly but surely. After all, humanity was initially given quite high rates of destructiveness, and fear of God in this system is an important balancing, restraining element. If the basic block on causing harm falls out of people’s worldview, the consequences of such a choice over time for the entire society will become truly disastrous.
Ch.: I understand that not all people have conscience and ethics. And that earthly laws that prevent people from committing crimes are imperfect and are written by those who do not follow them themselves. But people still tried to develop some kind of non-religious restraining mechanisms.
I.: You said correctly that these are limited measures. Do you remember from Christianity that God sees everything? He stands above all humanity. Here’s something for you to think about.
God sees everything. And you can hide a lot of things from other people. The hand of the law is limited, which means you can avoid punishment. Conscience sometimes demonstrates incredible resourcefulness even in completely decent people. The ethics you mentioned in society is secondary, it is a superstructure on a superstructure; Not only is it not the first layer of socialization, but not even the tenth. All this in difficult conditions simply flies off a person to the core. You could say he remains naked. And here comes the moment of truth for a person. If he is a believer, at such a moment he has himself, God, and his fear of God. That is, self-restraint against harm lies at a very deep level and even in difficult situations often works. If there is no deep faith, limiters easily evaporate, and a person can go “all bad.”
When the number of people without a living faith grows, the normal indicators of destructiveness inherent in civilization begin to break all anti-records.
And here another interesting question arises: if there is no God in a person’s heart, does this free him from responsibility for his actions? Is it really true that no one from above sees anything and will not react in any way, just because a person does not believe that someone from above exists at all? As you might guess, the Forces above can clearly see everything, and the responsibility of the soul inevitably comes.
And here we come to another important consideration. If negative events begin to happen to a God-fearing person, he immediately understands that this is a consequence of either his behavior or the behavior of the entire human society. That is, he immediately knows that he needs to work more carefully on himself and, if possible, guide those around him in a more constructive direction.
A believer constantly checks his behavior with the precepts of his faith. Fulfilling these covenants gives a person a feeling of security from the outside world. Something unfavorable is happening there in the world, but the internal process of reasoning for a believer is this: “I honor the will of God, I hope for his protection, I am not ashamed to pray to him about it, He will save my soul.” And this is a good approach. A believer really feels more protected from harm than an unbeliever. And if trouble overtakes him, he knows what to do in order to weaken or divert its influence on himself – he must change his behavior and thoughts in order to restore a good relationship with God. As for real security: followers of the Christian religion do support each other between levels. That is, belief in protection from above is not a game of the mind; protection really exists.
But what does a non-believer do in difficult situations? He begins to look outside for the causes of his problems. First of all, the source of his fears shifts outward. When a person does not believe in a higher will, he is left alone with the whole world, and hundreds and thousands of reasons for fear appear before him. Each exists on its own, each is capable of causing serious troubles, and there is not enough strength to cope with them. It could be anything: transport accidents, social upheavals, financial crises, wars, natural disasters, meteorite falls, etc.
The non-believer has no one to talk about all this with, except maybe with the same fear-stricken non-believers. A person cannot discuss his safety with anyone. Why? Because there is no God. But it is useless to talk about a war, a financial crisis or a natural disaster. This starts another unfavorable process in society – the spinning of the flywheel of fear. Its deepest primary reason is disbelief in a higher Power, with which you can somehow discuss your life and ask for protection in order to calm down at least a little.
Fear is a very toxic feeling; it poisons the earthly space no less than the consequences of the sense of impunity of atheists.
So, I have described to you the consequences of one single seemingly harmless, “fashionable and progressive” choice – humanity’s refusal to fear God.
C: Do you think it is possible to achieve the same results with some other set of philosophical ideas? Without threatening people with the wrath of God?
I.: This is the main mistake of modern man: to consider religion exclusively as a set of philosophical ideas that can be easily and without damage replaced. But religion is a very complex dynamic integrity. On the one hand, its ideological content evolves depending on the era. On the other hand, it has a fairly rigid skeleton – internal architecture. It’s difficult to design to be seamless. And then replacing its individual blocks is also extremely difficult.
So fear of God is not a philosophical idea. This is the most important element at ur. Aries architecture of religion. And I built the whole other philosophical system around it, of course, not by accident. Because the architecture of religion is already based on the universal laws, on the deep foundations of the evolution of souls, laid down in the Universe at the dawn of time.
Violation of these Laws, these sacred foundations leads the soul along a dangerous and unpredictable path, full of pain. These are not religious horror stories, but what can really happen to the soul. The question here is only in the presentation of information, you know? Christians do not want to anger God in order to avoid going to hell. Buddhists do not want to be drawn because of their attachments to the worlds of hungry ghosts and hellish beings. As you can see, in Buddhism there seems to be no God, but there are still hells. That is, at the architectural level, world religions have the same type of frightening elements, and this is not without reason.
Underneath the philosophical idea of the wrath of God lies a more than real, extremely painful process of the descent of souls into low-vibration layers. And not informing a person about this clearly and unambiguously is blasphemous, this is a crime against developing minds. So you need to stay away from those who want to rid spirituality of all uncomfortable and frightening elements and put a vase of vanilla marshmallows in the empty space.
CH: I am very impressed by this in-depth analysis. But to what do you attribute the increase in the number of non-believers?
I.: With the growth of human intelligence and the development of science. This is an inevitable process, often observed during the development of destructive civilizations. And yet this is a trap, turning the earthlings onto a crooked path. Since religion is initially created as universal as possible for the broad masses, as society develops there are more and more people who consider religious ideas to be simply a set of primitive, outdated stereotypes and ancient beliefs. Advances in medicine and science only strengthen society’s confidence in the triumph of the human mind.
You know, an interesting picture is observed on Earth now: the simplest people, the wisest and the most intellectually developed, believe in God. The stratum of people who are relatively smart and educated are almost all non-believers or nominal believers.
The simplest people look for support in faith; the world is too complex for them, and religion acts as a clear guideline for them.
Wise people who live with an open heart and feel peace in their souls may be non-religious, but they all believe in something. Moreover, somewhere deep inside they know and remember how to live in harmony with themselves and with the world.
People with brilliant intellects have dug so deeply into their studies of the universe that they simply cannot help but notice that the world around them has an intelligent creator. Moreover, they see that this world is reasonable in itself.
As for non-believers, I can only warn them against attempts to spread godless ideas among the broad masses. The responsibility of such convinced and active figures to the karmic system is many times higher. And the most successful sowers of atheism often find themselves in dark worlds after their earthly incarnation. Such people are most often driven by pride and arrogance, easily juggle complex ideas, and brilliantly win arguments on the topic of the existence of God. The theme of “God’s servants” acts as a red rag for them, and they tear it to shreds with particular frenzy. Imagine their surprise when, upon completion of the incarnation, they really discover themselves to be slaves, but not of God, but of much more frightening entities. So sometimes my tongue is my enemy.
And here I would like to thank you for your courage, because you allowed people to communicate with dark minds. You can be sure that these conversations had a positive effect. Nothing sobers up the human Ego more than contact with this original evil. Perhaps your decision was unpopular, and not everyone accepted it. But I support you in it.
Ch.: Thank you. But why still “servants of God”? If in Christianity there is a God the Father, then people could be his children.
I.: Why do I object? (Smiles) Times have changed, social classes have changed. A word that was appropriate before is no longer so appropriate now. What should replace it?
Ch.: Nicholas the Wonderworker and I have already discussed this topic a little – religious dogmatism, because of which nothing changes in Christianity.
I.: Do you remember from the Gospel about “rivers of living water”? (Smiles) You just had to let faith flow freely from heart to heart, and this would bring it natural renewal. The fundamentalism and dogmatism of the Christian elites blocked the channel of this river. They tried to preserve the truest truth even in small things, as a result their faith turned into an old swamp. Therefore, the facade of religion must be kept up to date. Do not whitewash the facades of earthly temples, but refresh the facades of faith.
CH: But how do you understand what can be replaced in religion and what cannot?
Any strong Christian preacher feels what can be removed from his religion and what cannot. In the end, there is an opportunity to receive a hint from above. Do not think that there are no contactees among Christians, although these people do not call themselves that. So there are ways to refresh your religion while still keeping what’s important. I just didn’t have the courage.
But a major renewal of Christianity is just around the corner. Vera needs fresh water.
Ch.: But tell me, through the “servants of God” you wanted to convey to people the understanding that man is not subjective in relations with higher Powers? Just as plants are non-subjective for us, with which a person does what he wants without asking them?
I.: With your question you only confirm to me the fact that through my religion I conveyed everything to people clearly and correctly. You do understand that I could not give the early Christians the concept of subjectivity and non-subjectivity in its original form?
OK, the word “slave” hurts everyone’s eyes and ears. I don’t mind replacing it. But think about this. Does a person gain more subjectivity from this mental-sparing replacement of words? No, nothing changes. The person still has little or no control over his life. Because, as one classic said: man is mortal and sometimes mortal suddenly.
But what exactly can I do for this little man, how can I help him? For example, I can explain to him how to become more subjective. How to earn the attention and respect of a higher Power that can protect him and somehow improve his life. To do this, you need to faithfully serve this higher Power and follow its commandments. Do I need such adherents? Needed. Am I ready to offer the strongest of them a good life in pure worlds? Ready. Am I strict in my requirements? Yes, I’m strict. An honest and always relevant offer to any Christian. I clearly explained to people the way to stop dangling like a leaf in the wind, to gain greater subjectivity and a more fulfilling life – through serving God.
CH: Does increased subjectivity imply greater freedom? Because if a person wants more freedom, the idea of a “servant of God” repels him.
I.: Take a child and an adult. An adult is more subjective. He can interact equally with other adults. He is free to do many things that are inaccessible to a child. And yet, an adult has more responsibilities. While the child walks, runs and frolics, the adult goes to work, fulfills various social obligations, and denies himself in many ways due to his higher responsibility. That is, the structure of freedom simply changes with increasing subjectivity: more freedom in some moments, less in others.
Therefore, consider increasing subjectivity not as an unconditional expansion of freedom, but as access to more complete control of your life, your personal processes. Plus as an opportunity to control the lives of other, less subjective participants. Such management presupposes freedom, responsibility, and awareness of one’s own limitations.
Increasing subjectivity implies that a person is provided with more information from above so that he can make wise choices in his life. They often ask him what he wants. But with a non-subject, life simply happens: decisions about his fate are silently made from above without his participation.
A person can seek freedom from the higher will, freedom from the Universal Laws, freedom to do whatever comes into his head. A person can deny the fact that his life is controlled by powerful currents of the higher will, with which he is not able to cope. I cannot help such people. The obstinate and the blind are clearly not for me. Let them continue to look for the winds in the field.
Those who like to find fault with details and make lists of what they don’t like in the spiritual system have been, are and will be. Such people simply have an immature, closed consciousness. It will be revealed later, not in this life, but in the next. There is no point in trying to open this green bud before the deadline, so as not to make it worse, because it can shrink even more.
First, a person himself must realize his need for support from above. The soul also gets very tired of pride, because this type of behavior brings it a lot of pain and loss. Sooner or later the soul becomes more friendly and receptive. And then she is already able to open up to some spiritual teaching and absorb it. There are also those who want to help such a person from above. Any spiritual system willingly accepts a person who is calm about the shortcomings of the world around him and gratefully accepts the opportunities that come into his life.
C: As far as I understand, your religion is so strict because it is balanced? After all, it was created for minds that follow a balanced path?
I.: It was initially obvious to me that without the rigor of religion there would be no spiritual growth. And yet, I was periodically called a “sullen deity” (Smiles). As you might guess, the modern stage of disseminating spiritual information in the form of “honey and oil” was an attempt to compensate people for the “missing love.” Spirituality has sharply turned positive. But this did not make earthlings develop any better. But they became more relaxed and lazy. We rested in the arms of idleness, reading Paulo Coelho somewhere on the seashore. They gently stroked their shortcomings, did not see the logs in their own eyes. The balance in spiritual development has been disrupted, the fabulousness has become too much. The idea was good, but earthlings have specifics, there are real indicators of destructiveness. This was not taken into account. A whole layer of frightening but truthful spiritual information has gone into a blind spot. The threat to souls remained very real, and information about it was buried under a heap of superficial inspirational stories.
But we have almost survived this stage too. “Honey and Oil” did a disservice to spiritually developing people. This is obvious to me. I won’t speak for others, let them draw their own conclusions. Let me just say that they have now started to keep quiet about my “gloominess”. And I recently took a group of Christian adepts from Earth to serve in the teaching system at the fifth level. They honestly deserved their reward. Partly because they showed devotion to their spiritual teachings, despite the fact that fashionable gurus selling revelations sat on every corner.
Your conversations with dark minds also gave important insight into the earthly system of development. After a long stage of gentle stroking from above, spiritual seekers turned out to be especially grateful for tough conversations with dark minds. Of course, this is the result of a small focus group, because your books are unknown among the general public. But those people who worked with your channelings spoke quite clearly in favor of strictness. They understand that stroking does not encourage development either. Spiritual growth is hard work. It requires discipline, renunciation of comfort, and the unpleasant truth in the face.
CH: As an architect of religion, have you probably ever had a desire to create some other system of beliefs?
I.: I tried a lot of different variations. But the Universal Cons do not change. The immutability of most of the tenets of the Christian faith does not come from my conservatism. They are based on strict rules that even the minds with the highest power in the Universe are subject to. Therefore, be sure that Christianity in one form or another will remain an unfading classic for a very long time (Smiles).
C.: But there are significant differences between Christianity and Eastern religions? And there is a difference between earthly religions and the spiritual knowledge that was brought to Earth from other civilizations.
I.: Yes, but none of these systems provides global coverage.
The Christian religion has its advantages. There are certain psychotypes of people whom she supports well. The architecture rooted in the Christian faith is very ancient, just like me. I have existed practically since the beginning of time and I know about as much as your masters from the adjustment group. I am the most ancient architect of religion in the Universe. I have seen the developments and results of all alternative earthly religions, just as I have seen thousands of variations of extraterrestrial spiritual systems. And yet I patronize Christianity. I continue to nourish adherents of the Christian faith. The reason for my consistent systematic support of Christianity on Earth is that it is the architecture of the Christian religion that contains most of the Laws that a person is generally capable of violating in his life. Other spiritual systems have both advantages and significant problems that cannot be solved within their architecture. There are no perfect solutions; and “all markers have different tastes and colors” (Smiles).
And yet, when people ignore the “mossy Bible stories” and move on in search of fashionable exotic beliefs, they do not understand an important thing: the Christian religion contains a universal set of truths that help the soul to integrate as quickly as possible into the higher-level worlds. An ascended teacher who comes out of Christianity turns out to be surprisingly intelligent, adapted to ministry, and seriously in demand at new levels. Many things that are important for his ministry are obvious to him; he does not need to be trained for a long time, he simply gets to work and begins to be useful. And I told you one of the key advantages of such teachers: this is fear of God, this is a high level of self-restraint.
Regarding adherents of other spiritual systems, I will remain silent so as not to seem biased. Let me just say that such ascended teachers have a very unique understanding of service, and they are more likely than my students to leave their places in the teaching system due to various misunderstandings.
And in general, religion is not needed for beauty, not for pleasure. Religion must work with souls at a deep level. Religion should show a person his weaknesses. She must help her adepts serve other souls and God, both on Earth and after ascension.
CH: Even a little strange. I know little about the Christian religion, but I feel very clearly in myself the feeling that you called fear of God.
I.: Nothing strange. Both of your VYa know the Universal Cons well. This is the deep memory of the soul.
Ch.: But you know, this fear of God was revealed most of all in me during conversations with dark minds. Especially with Samail. And the denser the darkness around me became, the brighter I felt the light inside.
I.: I’m telling you, contact with primordial evil incredibly invigorates the adept on his path to God (Smiles). But you shouldn’t get carried away with this, these are unsafe “vaccinations” for vigor.
Ch.: It seems to me that people in the Christian religion did not see what was inherent in it. Is it possible to write down these truths somehow more clearly?
I.: You know, I am very closely observing the behavior of people in this war, the resourcefulness of chaplains and military men who would give a lot not to see the commandment “thou shalt not kill” in the Bible. Tell me, is it possible to formulate this commandment even more clearly? Or are these people still spiritually blind?
I agree that living according to the dictates of any spiritual system is not easy. If it were simple, there would probably be many more young teachers on Earth now who could help humanity reach a new level of spiritual development.
But I’ll give you an example from earthly life – the education system. School and university are not easy for many people. And a serious part of students remain C grade students all their lives. And for some, these C grades are even given for diligence, out of sympathy for parents, or for a bribe. That is, the average academic performance of students is extremely low. But this does not give your society a reason to significantly lower the level of complexity of the educational program. This does not negate the compulsory nature of such subjects as physics, chemistry, higher mathematics, etc. No one looks up to those lagging behind, and does not try to make labor and physical education the only compulsory subjects.
On the one hand, it has proven difficult for people to absorb deep wisdom from religions. I emphasize the word “absorb” because people know all the important truths, they just don’t do them. And the flow of fresh knowledge that has flowed through guides in recent decades has not produced better results either. They made a lot of noise, but the effect was weak. On the other hand, is this a good reason to believe that there is something wrong with the training program? After all, a variety of programs have already been offered. Then we can assume that poor academic performance among students is to blame, and that many people a hundred don’t want to understand anything.
In this case, you need to realize that the training program is mandatory. It will not be cancelled, revised or simplified. You can choose which spiritual system you like best. But the qualities a person needs for development will still need to be acquired.
Ch.: In general, you do not highly assess the effect of fresh spiritual knowledge that has been seeded on Earth in the last decades.
I.: I highly value any spiritual knowledge: earthly and unearthly. I understand perfectly well how difficult it was for another architect to create the spiritual system that he brought into the world. I respect both his work and the work of those who sowed this knowledge for good on Earth. I also respect a person’s right to choose the system of spiritual knowledge that best suits his spiritual organization. But I want to make one important point clear.
So, new knowledge was sown, and people willingly went to study it. Fresh spiritual systems are growing in popularity. And existing religions appear to be losing ground. But not everything is as simple as it seems. The fact is that world religions are now not very actively feeding from above. Now they continue to feed only devoted adherents, but there are not many of them. And there is nothing special to encourage nominal believers from above. In addition, key prophets, carriers of the standard codes of existing religions, have not visited Earth for a long time. If you invest energy and resources into all this, spiritual systems that have now supposedly lost ground will revive again and gain popularity.
The current fashion for new spiritual movements is due to the fact that they are now still in the early stages of spreading on Earth. The carriers of their reference codes entered your world quite recently, and some are working in embodiment right now. In the early stages of expansion, more resources are invested in spiritual movements. For showing interest in new knowledge, the neophyte receives encouragement in the form of inspiration. That is, his attention is initially well nourished from above.
But when all these initial incentives from the new system end, at least some truths are not always fixed in a person’s head. The main problem with such external attempts to imbue a person with spirituality is that many seekers represent a sieve. They are poured with resources and wisdom, but find themselves unable to retain either. A person can only consciously approach retaining inspiration and knowledge within himself. And until the moment when a man-sieve, of his own free will, becomes a man-vessel, eager to retain every drop of spiritual wisdom he receives, neither well-known belief systems nor new ones will work.
The reason for the popularity of new spiritual movements is not that they are in some way significantly superior to traditional world religions, but that they feed newcomers to attract the attention. But it often happens that a person gets carried away by one thing and then burns out. Then – with something else, and burned out again. And here people make the wrong conclusions, that spiritual knowledge is somehow different, that it no longer inspires, and that we need to look further.
But it’s also not worth looking for long. Because employees of spiritual systems clearly see such defectors in search of free injections, who then still do not work on themselves. And each subsequent spiritual system that a person is going to get acquainted with is no longer particularly inviting. And if a person is persistent, he receives minimal or no nourishment at all. As a result, the person concludes that he has already sorted through everything, but hasn’t gotten caught anywhere. And apathy and disappointment sets in.
If a person has walked such a path and still hasn’t stopped anywhere, you need to realize that he is a sieve person. And make a volitional decision for yourself – to become a human vessel. Stop running around looking for “free lunches”, choose the most suitable spiritual system for yourself and start seriously working on yourself within the framework of its recommendations.
Ch.: People now often collect their spiritual knowledge from different systems, as they say, from the world one by one. Do you think the best way is to concentrate on one teaching?
I.: There is no better way. The path is always your own, real. Everyone follows their own path as best they can.
And yet there are stupid ways. For example, mixing too diverse knowledge in one head. From the point of view of real spiritual progress, such a decision is rarely successful.
I understand the desire to take the best from each spiritual system. I’m not suggesting being a narrow-minded religious fanatic. But you need to honestly evaluate your analytical abilities, because a person will need truly extraordinary ones in order to sort diverse, contradictory knowledge into shelves and build his own harmonious system. There is little point in storing information in your head in the form of a vinaigrette. Vinaigrette is good in a plate, but not in the mind – especially when it comes to spiritual development.
There is such an important trait for a spiritual adept – expressiveness. A person who thinks harmoniously within the framework of a well-mastered religious system usually already possesses this expressiveness. The harmony of his thoughts is achieved through careful, consistent mastery of certain spiritual knowledge.
When a person is well versed in one spiritual system and follows its recommendations, his indicators of spiritual development are already rated as high. Like-minded teachers from higher levels are watching him, they can help the adept, promote him and eventually take him to a new level to join their team. This is the easiest way to ascend between levels – to follow the path of an adept of one religious system.
When a person has diverse, contradictory spiritual knowledge mixed in his head, his situation is more complicated. On the one hand, he can follow a very difficult path of development – along the path of spiritual synthesis. In this case, a person really loads a large amount of different spiritual information into his head and builds a new holistic spiritual system for himself. He combines diverse elements in it, guided only by his own vision.
This is a huge amount of work and a risky path, since the realities on Earth are such that people do not have enough resources of the soul or the complexity of the mind for such a synthesis. Therefore, much more often you can observe in a person’s head not an elegant synthesis, but a prosaic vinaigrette. It seems to him that these motley puzzles, which he has piled up and continues to drag into his head, are valuable knowledge, and they are about to be assembled into a coherent system. But if you look into his time lines, at the prospects of his soul, there are already all the signs of a candidate for a new Cycle of the third level. Precisely because a person can never collect all this jumble into a single expressive picture, but he does not see this and continues his haphazard wanderings.
While a person indiscriminately collects spiritual information and considers himself a complex, extraordinary person, in the development system he has the status of “lack of aspiration.” And there is a high probability that later he will head into a new Cycle of the third level. That’s precisely because his eyes constantly run wild. Because he is not able to concentrate on anything, cannot devote enough strength and attention to one direction. Aspiration is when a person already knows what directions he wants to devote himself to, to which he does not mind spending many years and serious efforts.
So at a time when the most diverse spiritual information flows from above like a river, one must sober oneself with a clear understanding that a new level requires aspiration. And aspiration is concentration on something specific: one’s own, loved one, dear. There are adherents of Christianity and adherents of Buddhism. Masters of yoga or qigong. There are many training programs in which you can excel. But have you ever seen an adept or master of vinaigrette?
I see your thoughts. No, vinaigrette is not your case. During your life, you have acquired an extremely small amount of diverse spiritual knowledge. You have developed over the years, focusing on several not particularly controversial non-theistic knowledge systems: Buddhism, yoga, Castaneda, lucid dreaming. Over the years, you have read quite a bit, but you have worked a lot according to the recommendations of the systems you have chosen. And this was the right approach, your teachers strictly steered you away from trying to read endlessly and pushed you to work on yourself. The complex information that you are now receiving in the channel was offered to you only after the masters of Buddhism and the Castaneda school from levels above positively assessed your results. That is, first there were successes in the directions you chose, which acted as a strong foundation for your self, and then a set of new complex information began.
We touched on another important issue. People sometimes confuse spiritual reading and sharing of spiritual knowledge with spiritual work. But these are different things. Students read and learn, knowledge holders possess information and are able to convey it to other people. But only adepts think and live by their spiritual teachings. Only adepts act according to the recommendations of the chosen teaching.
And it is important for a person to honestly figure out for himself: which of these three is he? Sometimes all people do is absorb knowledge. That is, they linger as eternal students. Sometimes the bearer of knowledge does not understand that he speaks well, but does not follow the recommendations of his teaching.
So, if a teaching is chosen, one must strive specifically for the level of the adept, and not confuse it with the other two levels.
If a doctrine has not been chosen, it must be chosen. A person’s foundation in the field of spirituality must be strong and consistent. He can additionally study some other spiritual systems for the breadth of the picture, for erudition. But still, choosing one of the spiritual systems provides significant advantages.
After all, there are different levels of dedication to teaching. First, a person reads books and communicates with its adherents. This is the primary stage of forming connections with the Source. For Christianity, the Source is me, and below me is Christ. And below us is a powerful system of mutual support of Christian teachers and adherents at different levels right down to the Earth itself.
So, connections with teaching can be strengthened endlessly. Building These Connections Is More Than Memorizing the Bibleby heart. The adept does not strive to memorize all the quotes, but he strives to breathe, think, and live with his teaching. And when there is such aspiration, a new level becomes available to a person – the level of revelations. He can establish direct communication with superior Christian teachers and receive help from them. I am now using the example of Christianity to explain the advantages of concentrating on one spiritual teaching – they are significant. This is called devotion.
Devotion gives the adept access to serious support from above. This also applies to other religions. First of all, religions, because behind each of them there is a powerful spiritual system with impressive amounts of resources, strong teachers and serious patrons.
With various new spiritual movements, one can also try to build such connections between levels. But you need to understand that there may not be any long-term guarantees of support. Since these new currents on Earth are weaker, there may be interruptions in support and resources. Some currents are weakening and curtailing. Some fire quickly and quickly go out. And there is a non-zero probability that their Source will simply stop feeding this knowledge system and its adherents on Earth. You have a word – startup. Not all of them become century-old companies. New spiritual movements are also startups.
In a word, an adept can invest his strength for a long time, and as a result find himself without support from above, without a patron. It happens. But in this case, too, not all is lost, because the strongest candidates are found by other patrons. The person himself may suddenly become interested in some new knowledge, because this knowledge is part of the spiritual system of a new Source, which has become interested in the person.
This is a matter of preference: someone wants novelty, then he masters the recently emerged systems of spirituality. Others want reliability over long periods. For lovers of reliability, I recommend taking a closer look at one well-known spiritual system that has existed on Earth for centuries and going deeper into it. Then the person will be able to receive support from her teachers and from her Source. The main thing to remember is that superficiality is the enemy of any mastery.
Ch.: Can an adept on Earth generally go on his own, without any patrons, without delving into any spiritual systems?
I.: The physical body feeds on food. And the soul is fed by the Spirit. A person’s spiritual path is a path that someone from above feeds with inspiration. Inspiration is a valuable resource of extraterrestrial origin. And without it, a person is just a biorobot. Therefore, someone from above must pour the Spirit into the adept, otherwise he would not be an adept.
Patrons from higher levels are sometimes hidden, so a person may feel like he is himself – strong and conscious, without any support. So there is no need to be mistaken. For certain reasons, the patron may not manifest himself and provide the adept with wide freedom. But a person without infusions of the Spirit from above is simply unable to maintain either the integrity of his beliefs, or awareness, or elevated states of consciousness.
It happens that the patron of an adept is far from all systems of spiritual knowledge. Therefore, it seems to a person that he is an independent warrior of the spirit and he does not particularly need to look closely at new knowledge. However, the spiritual system can strengthen it. New knowledge can significantly expand a person’s capabilities and create additional directions for him to move into the future. In the end, all levels above earthly are teacher levels. And most of these teachers develop within the framework of some specific spiritual systems. If a person is going to move to a new level, the easiest way for him to find like-minded people, friends and a team for subsequent service is precisely by belonging to one of the well-known spiritual movements on Earth. After all, through them, many teachers have already left the Earth and are now working in the Earth’s development system.
C: Thank you for the conversation, Jehovah. There’s a lot to think about.
I.: And I thank you for your work.
Jehovah
https://absolutera.ru/article15308-iegova-arhitektura-religii
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
За контакти
Your Name:*
E-mail:*
Message:*
Type the characters you see here: