Abaddon – lord of the abyss and death

Published 17.04.2024 | By Йосиф

Abaddon – lord of the abyss and death

Contact: architect

The interlocutor is dark, approach the interaction consciously.

Ch.: Wikipedia: “In the New Testament book of Revelation of John the Theologian – in the episode when the fifth angel “sounded” the trumpet – this is the name of the “angel of the abyss,” the king of the locusts who came out of that abyss, “his name in Hebrew is Abaddon.” (Rev. 9:11)

Abaddon: Let’s stick to the pronunciation of “Abaddon”. Greetings, maiden.

Ch.: Will you introduce yourself in more detail? Talk about yourself?

A.: I will. Not for long. Look further for quotes, I’ll tell you which ones.

Ch: “One of the areas of hell”?

A.: Let’s say. More.

Ch.: “Place of decay?”

A.: Yes, being in my spaces is extremely uncomfortable.

Ch.: “Abaddon and death speak.”

A.: That’s right. I am the lord of death. Lord of the Abyss.

Ch.: As far as I understand, you are also not inclined to use the terminology offered to us by the Co-Creators? It’s just that later readers tell me that I have either high-tech or biblical anachronisms in my books.

A.: Do you strive to please the ungrateful? Be careful not to overstrain yourself. They do not want to realize that they are disrespecting the identity of each higher being. When the tongues were not yet in the project, we were already creating and destroying worlds. And we will continue when everything they knew turns to dust. Why would we talk and think the same? To indulge those who do not want to think and synthesize diverse information? Until lovers of simplifications and combing with one brush begin to move their convolutions, wisdom will continue to bypass them on a long road.

The rest read silently as they give. And they thank you. My respect to these travelers. Abaddon is stern, but merciful to those who experience the contradictory world without pretensions, without demanding that they be respected and served with lackey servility (preferably for free).

Ch.: I see what reader’s question you are pointing out to me: “I don’t understand that suicide is bad for the soul. I don’t understand why teachers are against the soul’s refusal to be in conditions that are unacceptable for it.”

A.: Your life belongs to you, create it according to the right of the Creator, but do not think about death. For death is not in your power. Remember this as a divine truth and avoid many pitfalls.

Ch.: What are the disadvantages for the soul of such an act as suicide?

A.: Look how “happy” the destroyers of life are, locked in the abyss of hunger and despair. They told you about their difficult lot not for the sake of your idle thoughts. The line between the worlds of existence is thin; everyone has the prospect of revealing a thirst for destruction. The destruction of other living beings and self-destruction are only two facets of one impulse directed against God. But God’s life is sacred. And the one who encroaches on the sanctity of life is a murderer. No matter what words this truth is spoken, no matter what arguments it is seasoned with, it lies at the very basis of the universe. All other Konas are built on this indestructible foundation.

Ch.: My soul had one suicide in other incarnations in this Cycle. I worked for a long time in my current life with its negative consequences, and now it seems to me that I have almost healed my soul after such an experience. But still, I did this on Earth, and not in the “abyss.”

A.: “The first time is an accident, the second is a coincidence, the third is a pattern.” If you have thoughts of suicide, who knows when they will arise? The more often a soul makes such a decision, the greater the chances that they will try to “treat” it using methods that cannot be called a pleasant pastime.

Ch.: In “places of decay?”

A: My girl. He gets used to anachronisms and is not picky. I see in you a love for deep speech, no matter what features it may have.

Speech is a tool for conveying ideas. Now fallen in a thick layer of decaying dust, the languages of the past were also once at the forefront of earthly culture. Realize their value for a certain period, and how much life resource was invested in making them a means of communication. The period is different now, but the languages of the past still have the power to reflect the deep essence of phenomena. Nothing has changed: they still represent powerful structured sets of connections connecting disparate Divine manifestations. Moreover, your modern languages have become significantly shallower due to progressive godlessness and disrespect for continuity. The connection with true earthly history was severed. The deep layers of the people’s consciousness were redrawn; they were deprived of a powerful foundation on which the superstructure of modernity was being built.

CH: Did I understand correctly that the languages of the past were more developed multifaceted tools for expressing ideas than modern languages?

A.: Yes, a layer of sacred speech was lost. As a result, the languages of the common people and traders remained. No wonder everyone is so obsessed with carnal pleasures and money these days.

CH: I’m familiar with this idea that language shapes consciousness*. But it still seemed to me that this was an exaggeration. Do you want to say that when people lost some of their words, some deep meanings also disappeared from their consciousness?

A: Do you want to eat food that you know nothing about? Do you want to master an area of knowledge that is not taught in your society placed? Do you want to turn to God using sacred speech if you don’t speak it?

Ch.: Probably, you can address God in any language?

Can i. But you need to know how to turn to God correctly in order to get real results. Imagine that there are healing prayers that work better than your modern drugs. But there is no point in memorizing them in order to repeat them mindlessly. Even if you understand their meaning, this is not enough for them to work. Because these are not just words, but calls to streams that are currently inaccessible to you. You must know, at the level of direct feeling in the subtle bodies, what kind of flow this is and be able to conduct it through yourself.

For example, you have the name of the drug “paracetamol”, but there is the tablet itself that needs to be taken orally. Now imagine that you repeat for the person whose pain you want to relieve, like a prayer: “paracetamol, paracetamol.” Will this empty muttering help him? No. You need to take a pill. It’s the same with prayer: the streams it refers to must be accessible to you, only then will they grant healing.

The easiest way is to cut off the community from previously accessible sacred streams by removing from the language that part that contains direct references to them. This is the first stage of weakening ties. Then some time passes, and people who no longer remember the query words for these flows also forget about past opportunities and lose the opportunity to use the power of sacred connections.

C: You said, “The connection with true earthly history has been severed.” Do you mean rewritten history before the 19th century?

A.: Yes. Including her. This was a questionable decision. The tree was cut off from its roots, moved to a new place, and there a kind of surrogate was added to it in place of its former powerful, native roots.

CH: What are the consequences of this decision?

A.: Nonsense. To put it simply, people have become stupid. A lot of deep connections that went back thousands of years into the Earth have not been preserved. It happens that a person really wants to better understand life and make a decision based on accumulated experience. He tries to dig deeper, and there is a hole. So they hang around helpless, no matter what they do, everything is wrong.

C.: Do you mean that earthlings have lost access to accumulated knowledge about the world, which can be perceived with the help of intuition? Or simply to knowledge from books of the past?

A.: People have lost access to direct living sacred knowledge. As direct and living as the recipe for borscht now, which is freely distributed either orally, in writing, or at the level of demonstrating the cooking process. And it is improved by every housewife with the help of intuition (Smiles).

C.: Why did they do this?

A.: We decided that it was the roots. That the roots came out dark, and the tree suffers because of this. Yes, only it is all created from the same matter. It was necessary to further treat and transform the entire tree. Do not hurry.

C: Who decided that?

A.: Managers, civilizations of the outgoing Cycle.

CH: Is there responsibility for such decisions?

A.: They themselves were torn off the tree now, like a painful growth. And who remains is under close supervision. And already without a saw in his hands.

CH: Therefore, now the apocalypse is not total, but extended over time, with the opportunity to survive and preserve the benefits of civilization? To preserve the roots?

A.: Yes, partly. Although the roots will be fairly empty again and will lose their former juices. There will be a stage of exhaustion, and then – filling with new strength and meaning. I think this is still more correct, softer. But what will come of it remains to be seen.

Ch.: I was told that the Russian folk formation is an ancient structure. Did she stay with her native roots?

A.: They left her part of their roots. Such decisions gave more intelligence, more awareness to individuals. But this partial deepening into the dark past negatively affects the present. You see, there are no perfect solutions. They try this way and that way. They look at how it will be more effective and which option has fewer problems.

By tree I meant the entire civilization. Many of its roots were removed along with the accumulated juices.

Ch.: You mentioned godlessness. Please explain why?

A.: If we put aside religion, then God lives in connections. And if they are torn apart without respect, without a carefully thought out plan, it reduces the abundance of the resource of life in the Universe. That’s why I called those who like to destroy powerful connections atheists.

CH: How is the life of ancient languages maintained that are not used on Earth now?

A.: The Earth is not the birthplace of these languages, but rather a branch where they were used to a certain extent and combination by people of the past. Of course, here the living volume of connections for communication was once increased, new shoots developed taking into account the properties of this particular area of the universe. But all the ancient languages are still alive. They are based on interspatial timeless structures that are capable of growing in any point of our World, if there is a need for them.

CH: I once read a long time ago that the power of ancient languages has weakened. This seemed to explain why the spells from the old books no longer worked.

A: This is incorrect the union of two unrelated phenomena. Ancient spells do not work because there is a ban on magic on Earth. It is possible to bypass it, but it is difficult and unsafe. Such actions can have detrimental consequences for the soul because they are a violation of the orders given to your community from above.

The power of ancient languages for earthlings has weakened, because the array of connections that was once built up here has long been inactive and is not particularly nourished. This is a deeply dormant structure. Therefore, it can be difficult for a person who studies ancient languages to find previous connections with them. But it is possible, and establishing connections with these structures can bring some kind of rich rewards to the seeker. I don’t mean that he will become financially successful. These fruits will enrich consciousness and give more complete sensations of existence. Have you ever read a book from a bygone era that seemed to breathe life? Were you deeply impressed by her? Sometimes the ancient world seems very close – literally at arm’s length. You close your eyes, take a step forward – and you are already there.

Ch.: I see the market straight out of oriental fairy tales. It has a very lively and pleasant atmosphere. The picture seems softened, but more juicy and saturated. It’s like there’s more yellow and a little less brightness. On the contrary, we have a lot of light, but it is colder and harsher. It seems that in your form there is even more life than we have now on Earth. And the properties of that space are different, not the same. uncomfortable and cruel?

A.: This was a period in the history of the Earth when the destructiveness of society was reduced. One of the bright bursts of hope for your civilization, one of the sunrises, after which there was day, and then – still sunset. The space was then full of life, optimism and hope for the future. If you want to strengthen your connections with this vision, you can look at the architecture of Samarkand, Agra and Marrakech. There are other places, but I find no knowledge of them in your memory.

Ch.: Valuable thoughts, thank you. But let’s return to the “worlds of decay.” It was explained to me that a soul whose personality was created unsuccessfully can end up in a destructor.

A.: Okay, let’s not complicate things – a destructor. Those who choose destruction in the broadest sense of the word end up there. Those who by their actions threaten the preservation of the divine source of life.

Ch.: But there are plenty of pests on every corner, and they live in free worlds, not in a destructor. Why then do they go to the destructor?

A.: You are a judge, remember. And I am just a guard. And the gate. And the very essence of this abyss.

Ch.: Am I talking to the controlling essence of the destructor now?

A: What surprises you so much?

Ch.: For some reason it seems to me that a formalized mind would be more suitable for this place. And yours is more like intuitive.

A.: I was formalized. But the researchers of the World wanted to carefully study the minds that fall into the destructor in order to find the patterns of such a disappointing fate. I was given the task of finding solutions to prevent the emergence of such minds. That’s when I became a free thinker and explorer. It was assumed that this would be more effective. But the change in algorithms happened so long ago that I don’t even remember being the same before the transformation.

CH: Can you help me remember who gets into the destructor and who doesn’t?

A: This is too broad a question. We have touched on the topic of suicide for now. So let’s look at it.

The whole soul has its own mind, of greater power. And its embodied fragment has its own, with less power. Both minds are the result of the development of a given soul and exchange information in a certain way. Of course, the whole soul owns the entire volume of data it has collected and patterns of behavior in the process of living. And the human mind has only limited access to this information and accumulates new knowledge in incarnation.

The desire for suicide is a simultaneous failure in many intellectual and sensory processes at once. The mind may well level out, and then this error will be considered non-critical. And the chances are high that a person will later be able to deeply comprehend his destructive aspiration and somehow heal himself so that subsequent failures do not pose a threat to life or do not occur at all. But if suicide occurs, the error of reason is recorded as critical. But it is still considered an error of the mind of the embodied fragment, and not of the entire soul. So, we have “the first time is an accident.” In fact, there may be more than one case. The main thing is to maintain a low percentage of cases of suicide of the soul in its total number of incarnations.

But if this percentage grows, researchers have a question: “Is this an accident?” But since the mind of the soul is the result of long-term painstaking work on its development, no one rushes to conclusions. Thus, the soul remains for a long time in the “second time is a coincidence” position.

Further, if suicides continue in various incarnations, in various conditions and with different compositions of Awareness in its fragments, the soul moves into the position of “the third time is a pattern.”

And then the judicial council and the ex-group get involved Perts, who can decide to partially cleanse the soul from the mind in the destructor. Or about the absolute death of the mind in order to cleanse the soul of unsuccessful patterns of behavior that make it suffer and strive for self-destruction.

C.: Why do they say that the soul “smolders”?

A.: There are certain analogies. After all, cleaning is not instantaneous. First you need to understand what else can be preserved and what only harms the soul. Sometimes the destruction occurs slowly, sequentially, in several stages. And between these stages there are breaks so that such souls can live again and show whether their results have improved. If partial cleaning helps, the soul no longer comes to me.

Ch.: Or maybe it’s not a matter of the mind? What if there is something wrong with the soul itself?

A.: It’s not that the idea is new. But it doesn’t give researchers anything. It is believed that this is an argument for lazy people who look for excuses for failures instead of continuing to look for effective solutions. Therefore, hardworking beings start from the idea that souls are perfect, and minds need to be improved until they become perfect. And with this combination it will be possible to achieve sustainable long-term prosperity.

C.: Probably, out of respect for the readers, I will not ask further about clearing the mind. The topic is unpleasant. Are there any other questions we should discuss today?

A.: I voiced the most urgent. So that those who find their weakness in the dark hour are not tempted by the imaginary ease of an unauthorized exit from incarnation. There’s no need to rush. The time will come, and death will come itself, exactly when it is appropriate. There is no need to take risks so as not to end up from a world where life flows in a stormy stream into my domain, where life only “smolders.” I have dispelled your ignorance and naivety. The knowledge of the abyss and worlds of hunger contains great power and wisdom that encourages us to strive for life in God. Those who are unable to strive will be able to turn away, realizing the real prospects of their initiative.

Create connections through which life flows, through which God moves forward in his search for the recipe for eternal life. Be not the pests that drain its streams.

Ch.: But connections on Earth are now being broken. People say that they broke off communication with many acquaintances because their opinions became completely different.

A.: Strong and promising ties will not be broken, but may even become stronger. They are fed from above.

Ties are broken with unequal exchange, when one takes, but has nothing special to give.

Connections are broken with empty exchanges, when out of boredom they chatter to the point of fatigue, and they themselves cannot explain why they need this idle talk.

Connections are broken when one of the participating souls is no longer ready to nurture this contact bilaterally. Perhaps due to a lack of personal resources and reluctance to borrow.

In a word, ineffective connections are broken. Now only viable ones are left. What good is it if the pieces are held together by a couple of thin threads? Only resources are wasted to continue connecting them while they are already rushing in different directions with all their might.

Decisions to break ties are often made between souls at levels of consciousness inaccessible to humans. If there is a repulsive impulse, you will have to accept the loss. Any connection between souls feeds and expends its resources. But now is the time to tighten our belts and temporarily forget about the delights of the past. The life of those who still read you can become laconic and spacious, like a hermit’s hut, where the only objects are a straw bed in the corner and a cross on the wall. And there will be little communication. And if it does, it will be about the path of the soul, not about the mortal.

Ch.: And for those who don’t read?

A.: Hope that they have enough sensitivity to restrain their thirst at a moment when the gates to the dark worlds are open. Now you shouldn’t strive too hard to preserve or increase what you’ve acquired if it naturally slips through your fingers. Desires can be easily satisfied, but not in vain. Then they will pay and will not be happy about this debt repayment.

Ch.: Thank you for the vision. It seems that the depth of impression will last for several more days. I wanted to read oriental tales or Omar Khayyam. I did not expect such a gift from the lord of the abyss.

A.: I saturate you with a thirst for life after an unpleasant period. It has value to you now. I have to thank you somehow for passing on the information.

If I have any questions, I’ll probably come again. While we refreshed our long-standing acquaintance. See you later, maiden.

*The idea was explored in the film “Arrival” (2016).

https://absolutera.ru/article12963-abaddon-povelitel-bezdny-i-smerti