Why do scientists lie

Why do scientists lie

Published 19.12.2023 | By Йосиф

Why do scientists lie that man built the first intelligent civilization on Earth?

To confirm that we are not even the second on the planet, I take only what is literally lying under our feet. I deliberately exclude the most striking evidence of this, such as the Egyptian pyramids, sparing the beliefs of the Orthodox.

She demonstrates the fantastic skills of dentists of ancient times. Native Americans could put jewelry in their teeth as early as 2.5 thousand years ago.

This palm print of a human hand in limestone is about 110 million years old. He was found in Glen Rose, Texas. You can even see the nails on it.

A fossilized finger has been found on Axel Heiberg Island in the north of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The age of this find is about 100 million years old. Radiographic analysis has shown that the find is precisely a finger, and not a stone object similar to it.

In October 1922, the article “The Mystery of the Petrified Sole of a Shoe” appeared in the New York Sunday American. It reported that the famous geologist John Reid, while searching for fossils, discovered a petrified footprint of a shoe on a rock. The contour of only two thirds of the sole has been preserved. The thread connecting the welt of the shoe to the sole was clearly visible. Then there was another seam, and in the center, at the place where the foot pressure was greatest, there was a depression, which would have remained from the heel bone, erasing and wearing out the sole.

John Reid brought this sample to New York, where experts agreed with the dating of the mysterious imprint – 213-248 million years.

Shoe manufacturers characterized this print as an impression of the sole of a shoe with a handmade welt, and micrography revealed all the smallest details of twisting and curvature of the threads. This is the footprint of an upright man who walked the earth and wore shoes more than 200 million years ago.

Naturally, scientists declared the “sole of the shoe” to be a “miracle of nature” and an “amazing fake” at the same time.

Another shoe print was discovered in the clay shales of Utah by trilobite collector William Meister. Breaking a piece of slate, he saw a fossilized footprint, and next to it — the remains of trilobites, fossil marine arthropods. The age of the slate with the prints is 505-590 million years. The heel print is pressed into the rock 3.2 millimeters more than the sole, and is undoubtedly an imprint left by the right foot, judging by the characteristic wear of the heel.

Scientists, of course, declared this find a “strange case of erosion.”

It’s an ordinary looking hammer. The metal part of the hammer has a length of 15 centimeters and a diameter of about 3 centimeters. But it has literally grown into limestone about 140 million years old, and is stored together with a piece of rock.

This miracle caught the eye of Mrs. Emma Khan in June 1934 in the rocks near the American town of London, Texas. The experts who examined the find immediately came to a unanimous conclusion: a hoax. However, further research conducted by various scientific institutions, including the famous Battel Laboratory (USA), showed that everything is much more complicated.

Firstly, the wooden handle on which the hammer is mounted has already turned to stone from the outside, and inside it has completely turned into coal. So, her age is also estimated in millions of years. Secondly, the specialists of the Metallurgical Institute in Columbus (Ohio) were amazed by the chemical composition of the hammer itself: 96.6% iron, 2.6% chlorine and 0.74% sulfur. No other impurities could be detected. Such pure iron has not been produced in the entire history of terrestrial metallurgy.

https://ecology.md/ru/page/zachem-uchenye-lgut-chto-na-zemle-chelovek