The Dark Archangel Samael: The Imperfection of Evil

Published 17.12.2023 | By Йосиф

The Dark Archangel Samael: The Imperfection of Evil

Channeling: architect

A conversation with the highest dark hierarch. Approach the interaction consciously.

TA Samael: Greetings, virgo. Accept the message. We are not sleeping, dear ones, we continue to work.

I suggest thinking about the distinction between the manifestations of evil, and about the boundaries when the harm caused can no longer be called evil, because it loses its original properties, turning into something else.

What is the difference between a fire lit to destroy an enemy’s house and a fire lit to melt metal to produce household items? What is the difference between terrorism with the bombing of civilians and an industrial explosion to demolish a building? What is the difference between a knife in the hands of a murderer, a butcher’s knife on a cattle farm and a scalpel in the hands of a surgeon? The difference is in intention.

Fire, explosives and a knife are the same. These are highly destructive dangerous tools, careless handling of which ends in injury or death due to lack of ability to use them. That is, to use highly destructive tools requires skill. With skillful hands, fire melts metal, but does not burn anyone; pieces of a building after an industrial explosion fall exactly where they are safest to fall; and a sharp knife is used to get food or save lives.

There are many situations in life where softer tools dramatically reduce the effectiveness of solving a problem. The same old building can be disassembled by hand brick by brick, but the amount of effort spent will be incredible. As they say: the sheepskin is not worth the effort.

So, we have identified three components of the question: discernment, intention, and mastery.

The fourth component: the recipient of the benefit. When picking up a highly destructive tool, a person first needs to find out who benefits from it. If, first of all, he himself, as in the case of an arsonist, terrorist or murderer, a heavy karmic burden arises.

But the surgeon uses his scalpel to help people regain their health. There is also a benefit for him – the doctor does not work for free, but the primary recipient of the benefit is obvious – these are his patients. On the one hand, the surgeon cuts living flesh, on the other hand, all this no longer has a marker of “evil”. This is an interaction of a completely different nature: it is still unsafe, but in fact it already contains creative potential. And the participants enter into such interaction voluntarily. The surgeon does not force the person who will be operated on. Third parties also do not consider such interaction to be violence.

What is the most destructive thing when using highly destructive tools if a person’s intention is to benefit others? Unprofessionalism is a lack of knowledge and a lack of a firm, skillful hand.

Every person periodically harms others. The only one who does not harm anyone is the one who does not communicate with anyone. The damage is relative when there is a concomitant positive effect. As they say, for the sake of a useful cause, you can be patient. The damage is pure when there is no beneficial effect. When the same fire is kindled, but in the end it only causes harm.

In your world, at your level of development, harm is often caused by misunderstanding. And you have to accept in advance that all of you sometimes hurt each other, even when you want to do the best.

So, the bad thing is that, following their good intentions, people decide to use a destructive tool that they are not good at using.

I’ll give you an example right away: a quarrel between merchants in the market. Each participant stands for the truth, while toxic streams of abuse pour over each other’s heads.

A higher level of skill is a dispute. The more developed the participants, the better the arguments, and the more pleasant it is to listen to all this.

An even higher level of skill is polemic. When the participants are educated and erudite, but one of them definitely wants to win a verbal duel.

The highest level of skill is discussion, when everyone voices their arguments, but everyone has the same goal – to reach some common opinion, even if someone has to compromise. I call discussion the highest level of mastery because it is a tool for finding solutions to problems at the highest levels. The team members involved in the development of souls are very different, their opinions do not always coincide, but still their task is to find a “common denominator”.

Another example: a person wants to point out to his loved one his disadvantage, but does not know how to do it correctly, so he just presses on the sore spot and makes it worse. This usually happens spontaneously: because of surging feelings, because of accumulated resentment. Sometimes people just can’t keep it in themselves anymore: the vessel of their discontent has overflowed and poured over the edge. There are millions of such interactions on Earth, every day. Inept collisions, from which people come out without any benefit, without conclusions about what can be improved in themselves, even more unhappy than they were before.

Why is this happening? Because you are all good girls and boys in your understanding. Few people want to think about how to harm carefully, wisely and with concomitant benefit, because harm in the human understanding is impossible at all. This is the kind of hypocritical society that was originally built, where it is not good to harm according to social norms, where it is only good to sow good and light. Therefore, everyone looks decent: smart, powdered, smiling. But everyone is hurting each other anyway. Moreover, these actions are uncontrolled, unconscious, and therefore even more dangerous.

Since harm is taboo, the desire to cause it accumulates inside, and is often hidden from oneself. And then it splashes out clumsily and ugly, like a garbage can on a random passing poor guy.

And even in this case, talented fans of deceiving themselves manage to come up with a clever excuse. In the spirit: “Why did he pass by my doorstep? So it’s your own fault.” Or: “I am a great fighter for purity!”

But the fact remains that garbage buckets and chamber pots are poured on someone else’s head every day, hourly. Humanity has created a surprisingly wide kaleidoscope of excuses in order to somehow justify and whiten itself for the harm caused, primarily in its own view. Everything is generally clear to the people around, everything is clear to the examiners of civilization. But the person himself sometimes does not see how he looks from the outside. And that’s the problem: you have to learn to see yourself honestly. It can be unpleasant, but necessary.

The potential for human sabotage is high. And I would say that the first important step for a person to clarity and self-control is for him to honestly tell himself that he is a pest, that he has it in him. But the more this fact is pushed out of consciousness, masked and justified, the uglier a person sheds his accumulated destructive impulses into the outside world when he becomes unbearable to hold them.

Why is this happening? Because a person does not want to impartially study their internal processes and learn how to manage them. He does not want to see clearly and honestly label the contents of his own mind. Where there is gold, and where there is shit, there is enough in every head.

Streams of human consciousness, like water in a river, deftly flow around stones and carry their logs and other debris further downstream. The only problem is that with age, the amount of all this “good” accumulates. And there may come a moment when there are already thin trickles left from the full-flowing river, breaking through the piles of all kinds of garbage. And this accumulated heaviness poisons a person from the inside.

Not everyone looks inside in this case, because it’s scary. But, since we are not looking for the source of problems inside, it means that we are looking outside. And then the people around you are to blame.

There is only one way out of this situation: you need to honestly look deep into yourself to find the true reason for your dissatisfaction with life there. And whatever the amount of work to clean up your riverbed, it needs to be done. This is the only way to improve something in your life, so as not to further harm yourself and the people around you.

Not every reader has his streams running. Someone has already done a good job. And yet: we are looking for stones and logs in our internal streams, dear ones. There is no need to carry these weights.

In the early stages of the development of minds in destructive civilizations, there is always an effect that we will conditionally call the imperfection of evil. Humanity is now reaping the fruits of the mass manifestation of the imperfection of its own evil. And we have already briefly discussed the four factors leading to this effect:

1) inability to distinguish between destructive;

2) the inability to realize the intention, both his own and those around him;

3) lack of skill in the use of destructive tools, despite the fact that a person cannot refrain from using them;

4) self-deception, when harm is caused for one’s own benefit, but is covered by good intentions.

Imagine that a serious opponent is coming at you, a strong warrior who knows both combat strategies and many types of weapons, and each of his own muscles. In your world, evil strives for perfection. It lives by the law of “survival of the fittest”, so it spends a lot of time and effort to comprehensively strengthen its invulnerability.

How can you defeat such a warrior without knowledge of destructive tools? After all, he is a complete mystery to the common man, a kind of vague but serious threat about which nothing is known. What is the first step he can take in his attack? Unclear. He has hundreds, thousands of options in his arsenal. And for a simple person who does not know any combat strategies, weapons, or his body, it is impossible to cope with such a warrior. Courage is not the answer here.

And now let’s remember the story of David and Goliath. Every opponent has their weaknesses. But you have to be able to see them. It is necessary to be able to mentally disassemble the destructive system into elements in order to sort them out and find the hidden slack there.

David threw a stone from a sling at Goliath’s forehead. But if we are not talking about a physical duel between two people? If the opponent is a well–coordinated structure of a whole group of people, for example, a criminal gang? After all, it is not initially clear where the “forehead” is, where the “shield” is, and where the “spear” is? Therefore, it is necessary to understand how this hostile structure works, how it is arranged so that a person has at least some chance to stay alive. This requires intelligence, erudition, for this you need to understand the structure of a destructive system, the properties of its individual elements, etc.

Even if it is just a verbal duel: if the opponent is educated, cunning and witty, he cannot be defeated by the approach “I am for justice, and he is a goat.” This approach to fighting is very typical for people who are not interested in the device of destructive tools and systems. Due to the complete inability to distinguish between the properties and methods of a developed opponent that a person has contacted, his chances of winning are negligible.

So, we have highlighted a serious problem in the development of earthlings – the unknown, unidentifiability of “evil tools” for them, because many people simply do not want to study their device. It’s like a blurry picture in a person with poor eyesight: nothing is really visible and it’s unclear how to interact with it. But if you throw a stone anywhere, the effect will be zero.

The refusal to study destructive tools, even at a theoretical level, is often justified by the fact that a person is not going to use them, and does not want to have anything to do with the people who use them. That is, he is guided by high moral and ethical standards. As a result, we have a decent, naive and defenseless person.

But understanding destructive tools does not automatically imply any dishonest or criminal actions from him. Such knowledge can be used to protect yourself and your loved ones from an unsafe environment. That is, knowledge of destructive tools increases a person’s stability, gives his thinking greater flexibility and variability. He begins to understand the strategies and moves of his opponents, more skillfully dodging their punches. The blurred picture gradually acquires sharpness, the details begin to differ, to be marked correctly, and then it is already possible to choose competent ways of responding.

I’ll ask you a question. How many murderers, maniacs and rapists would be roaming the streets now if no one wanted to delve into their way of thinking in order to catch them and isolate them from law-abiding citizens? A criminologist is not a criminal, but he understands the actions of a criminal well. A criminologist performs a valuable protective function for society.

CH: I would like to return to the battle with Goliath. But wasn’t David’s strength in his faith in God?

TA S.: That’s right, and this is a separate long conversation. How much can one little man do under the guidance of the Power he faithfully serves. But in this case, man is only an instrument of the manifestation of the supreme will. If David had wanted to kill Goliath for his own selfish purposes, he would hardly have succeeded. That is, the brave young man handed over his own will, body and life to his God during the duel.

But, to use the words from our history: David, who skillfully wields a sling, is a more valuable tool for God than David, who does not wield it. And if Goliath suddenly wants to serve the God of David, a truly invincible alliance can turn out.

Ch.: Could you give examples of destructive elements and systems?

TA S.: Globally, government agencies, corporations, criminal structures, legislation, mass media, propaganda, methods of mass consciousness management, the art of persuasion, modern culture (cinema, music, video games, etc.) are all the most complex destructive systems that have a tremendous impact on humanity. But people often are not able to protect themselves from the harmful influence of the surrounding world, and even more so are not able to act as brave, noble defenders of other people from the advancing networks of evil.

Ch.: I partially see how these evil networks work, but I have no desire to fight them. I just want to live a peaceful, creative life.

TA S.: This is also an effective way of fighting: not to be deceived. The more uninvited, conscious people want to live a peaceful, creative life, the weaker the networks of evil, because they are so actively crawling due to the passive, secretive absorption of new participants. For example, a patriot watches news about the war every day and cheers for his homeland, but gradually ceases to see the main thing: that he has already let darkness into his soul, rejoices at the deaths of others. Violence has become an acceptable, normal part of his life. You can’t let your mind cloud, you can’t get used to it, you have to keep immune to all zombie influences.

So, if the broad masses of the world’s population learn to distinguish well the elements of destructive systems in order to resist their hostile all-round influence, a new peaceful path to development will become available to humanity. Therefore, we must be smarter so that intellectuals working for the powerful of this world can no longer twist the kind and noble like suckers around their fingers. And in general, so that no one can impose on a person by cunning their own picture of the world, which is alien to them.

The soul incarnating in the worlds of destructive development loses its innocence. And she often makes the mistake of being nostalgic for her innocence. This nostalgia prevents the soul from knowing the world around it, and encourages it to create isolated illusory structures around itself, like a mother’s womb, into which the soul seeks to escape back. In such a “womb” she remains alone with her inner world, so that no one interferes with her daydreaming there.

Instead of understanding the world into which she has fallen, taking the best out of it and building on this her subsequent upward development, the soul may try to regain its innocence. But since this is not possible, she rather starts playing the “picture of innocence” game. To some, this seems to be a development on a bright principle, but it is more like a game of the mind: to put on a white dress and call yourself “a girl who has not known her husband.” I’m saying this now without reference to gender, this way of thinking happens to both women and men.

Everyone has already learned everything: they drank from this world of pain and hurt other people themselves. And the task of developing a master of balance is to lose also the naivety, because of which people refuse to know the world around them and themselves. And they do not want to part with their naivety, because they do not like the structure of the world and their own, they do not accept it. This naivety of the mind leads again and again to the need for the soul to incarnate in low-level destructive worlds of the earthly type.

This is how the need for oblivion and illusions manifests itself: no matter how many of them you try to break from the outside, the soul creates new coverings, new structures of the “womb” around itself and dives back into its dreams. But because of the unwillingness to see oneself and the world naked, without embellishment, even if it is repulsive, the soul gets stuck in development. And instead of confidently walking her way forward and upward, she puts a tent with dreams on the side of the road and hangs there for a long time. He comfortably arranges everything to his liking inside, and does not stick his nose out. The path can be harsh, sometimes the winds blow on it, and the snow sweeps in your face. Therefore, it is certainly more comfortable to sit in a tent. But the development of the soul always takes place on the way.

Ch.: I am currently reading a book with instructions from a Christian monk, which the man clearly wrote with the highest inspiration. Surely it cannot be said about such people who follow the path of asceticism to God that these are “brides in white dresses” trying to regain their innocence? They inspire deep respect. Then how can their path be characterized?

TA S.: That’s a good question. What is the postulate underlying their path? Sinful. Their entire development is based on it. These people are honest with themselves. They see and acknowledge their shortcomings, strive for inner purity. They are open to their God and his will. They are ready to pass their trials of the spirit in humility. But this path requires serious courage and even fearlessness. After all, a person renounces earthly things without any guarantees that God, whom he has decided to know, will bestow upon him in return the highest grace.

That is, in the process of monastic life, a person makes a great sacrifice, offering his gifts to God in the form of three renunciations: renunciation of the world, renunciation of his selfish will, renunciation of self-love as “God’s chosen one”.

The last renunciation is the hardest, not everyone can cope with it. When higher currents begin to flow through a person and some miracles are performed by his hands, the temptation is great to be proud of one’s own God-chosen. Here, the opposite increase in selfishness is possible. And in order to explain to the “chosen one” that he is only a conductor of power that does not belong to him, the streams of grace and miracles through him dry up. So that he repents and establishes a more harmonious connection with his God with a new degree of clarity.

If we talk about successive wise adepts who have passed all three stages of renunciation, then I completely agree with you, these are not the “brides” I am talking about. “Brides” are people who do not want to admit their impurity, because it hurts them. When the impurity from oneself is covered with a white dress, a person does nothing with it, because he does not see himself. When the impurity is detected, it is already possible to work with it somehow. This is the point where the illusion dissolves and the real path of self-improvement begins.

Let’s return to the main topic. In any situation in which a person has the intention to use a destructive tool, once again look at the four factors of imperfection of evil and answer our questions:

– Do I understand where to push? Or am I going to push anywhere?

– Why am I doing this? What is the real need? Should I act at all?

– What kind of tool am I going to use? Do I understand how to use it correctly? Do I have a reasonable interaction strategy? Have the possible consequences been calculated?

– What is my benefit? What is the benefit of my actions for other participants in the situation? Am I going to harm other people out of my own selfishness?

In each specific situation where it is necessary to use a destructive tool, there is a minimum, but sufficient rigidity, below which the impact is ineffective, above which it is excessive.

There is no point in just warming iron ore, so you won’t get metal. It makes no sense to detonate firecrackers in the basement of an old building, so it cannot be demolished. There is no need to blunt the surgeon’s scalpel, so the patient will only get worse. That is, in any destructive impact, an accurate, minimally sufficient measure is needed. Finding a measure is hindered by emotions, bias in assessing the situation, and incompetence.

Imagine a straight line with two opposite values at the edges. At the leftmost point there will be a pole of “ruthlessness”, at the rightmost point there will be a pole of “pity”. Not sympathy, because sympathy is the highest feeling, namely pity. That is, indecision, softness, formlessness of a personal position due to the fear of causing harm.

When a person is compassionate and tolerates for a long time, he may lose his composure for a brief moment and commit a harsh irreparable action in retaliation. Or unknowingly, stealthily begin to harm, remaining unable to explain to himself the reasons for his strange behavior. Sometimes it is an unconscious harm to others, sometimes to yourself. It also happens that pity for others and the inability to respond strictly to them is expressed in the fact that a person inside whips himself. Therefore, it is also harmful to endure and regret for a long time, and for all participants in the situation. It is necessary to learn to react consciously, carefully, without starting a situation, without accumulating powerful emotional charges, which, like a spring, can then shoot painfully.

At the opposite pole lies ruthlessness. I don’t think there’s much need to explain. It’s when you do harm and you don’t regret anything. His hand did not waver, his conscience remained silent. Any dark master is guided by ruthlessness. It is honed by earthly “evil geniuses” and manifests itself in the form of cold prudence. But for the development of normal human sensuality, it is strictly not recommended to master ruthlessness. It’s okay to feel, you don’t have to tighten your nuts too much.

At this point, students have a basic misunderstanding when studying this topic. So what about feelings and emotions? After all, if they are cooled to increase self-control, you can fall out into ruthlessness, into cold calculation. Here, a very specific compensation is needed in the form of good-naturedness and empathy, which is found among talented teachers. I would say that such people, avoiding a helpless and ineffective “kind” position, grope for a reasonable measure of rigor, devoid of any malice.

I didn’t find a better example in your head, so let’s refer to it, it’s quite suitable: the movie Operation “S”, the scene “It’s necessary, Fedya, it’s necessary.”

Confusing his pity and indecision with sympathy, a person can engage in connivance. In this case, one should not be surprised that nothing resolves itself, the situation worsens, and its participants behave worse and worse.

Confusing his arrogance with boldness in defending his interests, it is not surprising that the world reacts harshly and soberingly in response. The “strikers” of the struggle for their interests sometimes do not see themselves that they have already entered someone else’s territory and infringe on others.

There is no need to go to extremes. Extremes are always unsafe. Therefore, it is necessary to look for a measure of the necessary destructive impact in every difficult situation with the help of a clear mind. Man is not a terminator. A man is not a pathetic, eternally beaten dog. It is necessary to look for ways to protect personal boundaries and interests in a healthy way, sometimes to show reasonable rigor, but not to overdo it.

A reasonable measure of human dignity never looks like obsequiousness and acceptance of someone else’s arrogance.

A reasonable measure of human dignity never looks aggressive.

A reasonable measure to protect one’s human dignity is located at the point of crossing the personal borders of the participants with entry into someone else’s territory in the amount of no more than 2-3%. To go deep into places where a person was not invited is arrogance and selfishness. Letting uninvited guests into your territory and silently suffer from it is a weakness of spirit and indulgence in someone else’s tactlessness.

Ch.: Are the dark teachers completely evil?

TA S.: Not perfect, but very virtuoso.

Ch.: So the imperfection of evil comes from human underdevelopment, and we need to learn how to use destructive tools in such a way that they bring maximum benefit to others with minimal harm?

TA S.: Yes. Understanding the properties of destructive tools increases self-control and effectiveness of actions if a person decides to apply them himself. And at the same time, it increases a person’s security if destructive tools are used against him.

So, the real way for people to get rid of the imperfection effect of evil is to understand how it works. This makes it possible to recognize him in himself and in the world around him. Such an impartial identification helps a person in personal transformation. And a lot of qualitative individual transformations will eventually give rise to a fundamentally different, more perfect society.

If you do not work with the deep darkness inside yourself, but go to the top, it will be like whitewashing walls eaten away by rust and fungus. Dirty spots will inevitably reappear again and again.

A person who does not see his own darkness remains helpless both in personal transformation and in the transformation of others. A person who sees his own darkness is able to cope with it and help other people in recognizing their inner darkness.

Ch.: Does it seem to me that the dark teachers in the extreme messages have stopped pushing so hard?

TA S.: That’s right, we used to push to understand the essence of each person and provide the development system with our conclusions. Now we’ve seen everything we wanted to see. And it is also impractical to push once again.

We are the same, but the development system has now given us a new format of interaction with those who continue to work on themselves – the format of information support and protection of valuable people from the illegal attack of dark essences from the outside. We also have not too rigid parts that are suitable for such work.

But we do not protect anyone from our own darkness and from the parasites that man feeds with his weaknesses. Such people need to sort themselves out and close the gaps in their personal protection.

We don’t put pressure on those who have everything worked out, they just get information from us for reflection. Those who still need to work, we can put pressure on them. Who thinks that we are pushing too hard: we are pushing normally, you still don’t have enough stability, you need to continue working or not read our messages. Whoever reads, agrees to work and get the necessary influence from us for his development. As they say: you called yourself a bunch, get in the back.

That’s enough for today.

CH: Thank you.

The Dark Archangel Samael

https://absolutera.ru/article15993-temnyy-arhangel-samail-nesovershenstvo-zla